The point is everything we experience is the result of our brain processing info and instructing our sensory systems on how to perceive this information. If you are willing to really look at this from a scientific perspective there is no literal way to prove the scientist or his equipment exist in the fundamental sense.

Having said this, it’s perfectly fine if you don’t agree with this article. There is plenty of other content on this site that I hope will serve you in a positive manner.

For readers who would like to hear more of my perspective:

Many medical doctors and laboratory researchers are quick to point out this very real “flaw” in the way we relate to and experience the world. If people are not willing to try and step into an objective position and look at this I guess that’s fine, but the fact is most people will defend a reality that simply does not stand up to a scientific process.

Why? Because by nature humans appear to be very docile and obedient in terms of what we’ll accept and believe; we were told in grammar school the material world is real, and prime time TV concurs, so this MUST be the way it is.

The fact remains what we perceive as reality is by no means incorrigible. There is a good deal of evidence to suggest that our experience of the world is extremely malleable and based primarily on our beliefs.